You run a business because someone expected you to. A mentor built it over thirty years and handed it to you with a title and a desk. Staff, customers, your spouse and your mother all know the plan. Revenue is flat, you are good at the work, and you want none of it. The dread starts on Sunday evening and has a schedule you could set a clock by.
The man in this seat was thirty-six, general manager of a commercial cleaning company. The coach who gave him his first job at nineteen had built it and wanted it to go to him. “I built this for you,” the coach said, and meant it as the greatest compliment he knew how to give. Three years in, by 7:30 on Sunday his stomach tightened, and by nine he was in the garage, doing nothing, with the door half down.
The usual fix is to try harder to want it, or to quit abruptly and carry the guilt. Neither one answers the question underneath, which is whether the goal is yours.
Is it okay to walk away from a business someone built for me?
Yes, if you have looked at what it costs and you do not want what it produces. Whether you want the goal now is what matters. Where it came from matters less.
I do not tell people to quit. If he were keeping the company out of love, reciprocity or the wish to belong to the coach’s circle, I would call that a real driver and treat it with respect. Plenty of inherited goals are worth keeping. There is no right or wrong here, just outcomes and consequences.
So I gave him three tells for an installed goal. One: it survives on obligation instead of appetite. Two: you defend it in somebody else’s words. Three: when you picture the finish, the person celebrating hardest is someone other than you.
He answered quickly. Obligation: yes, he stayed because leaving would hurt the coach. Someone else’s words: “He built this for me” had been his reason for three years, in the coach’s voice. The celebration: the coach, then his mother, then a long gap.
Then I asked the question I put to people who feel pressure from someone close. Are you in business because you want to say you are a business person, because you want to make more than you could otherwise, or because you want time? He had no answer for the first two. Time was the answer. He wanted his evenings, and he wanted work he would choose.
What is the market willing to pay me for?
It is willing to pay for what you have learned, delivered where a buyer has a gap. His answer was sitting in the work he said he hated.
The money in his region landed in a few institutions. A school district anchored his customer list, and the district rebid its contracts on a cycle. The margins were thin and the buyers were professional. I would not ask a tired person to fight for share there.
The next ring out from the same institutions was the hospital systems. They spend heavily on environmental services, they hire for a director’s seat, and they value what he had learned in three years: how to hold a standard across forty sites, how to run night crews, how to answer to an inspector. A director’s role there is a job, and it pays for more experience, more connections and more insight. The coach had mentioned once that a hospital system’s facilities VP had asked about him at a chamber lunch. That is a market read. It said his skill was worth more than his current seat, and it said who was asking.
What if I need the income right now?
Then the income is the mission for this season, and that is not a flaw. There are waves in a life. Some seasons you do a thing out of financial survival, and it has to get done. That is paying the mortgage and supporting the people around you. It is not ego and it is not guilt.
He had a mortgage and a baby due in the fall, so he could not simply leave. Here is why I think of the answer as a diversion. A pilot who decides to divert has authority to change the destination in the air. It is a decision, taken with enough fuel on board to reach the alternate, a plan for where to land, and a call to the controller. Diverting is a normal part of flying and does not count as a failure. A diversion without fuel is a different event.
His nine months were the fuel. In that window he would run the company well, build the hospital-side application, and prepare the coach’s exit in a way that served the coach. A bridge with a date on it is a diversion with reserves, and it is different from a trap.
The conversation with the coach took two sittings. The first was hard. The second, a week later, went better than he feared. The coach said he had wondered for a year whether the title was a gift or a weight. He sold the company to another cleaning company that wanted the district contracts, for more than he would have gotten from a tired successor, and the staff kept their jobs.
Changing or abandoning a goal that did not start with you is a success. He got his life back, and the coach got a better ending than the one he had planned. At the picnic the next summer, the coach shook his hand and said it was the first time in years he looked rested. Neither man had to be the villain.
The move for this week
Pick the one goal you suspect is not yours. Write it at the top of a page. Answer the three tells in writing, one line each: obligation or appetite, whose words, who is celebrating.
Then write what it costs to keep it, in money, time, effort and energy, and decide whether you would pay that price on purpose.
If the answer is no, write the bridge. Put down what has to be true financially for the next season to begin, how many months that takes and the date you will check.
Tell one person who loves you before you tell the person who built it. Ask what they see.
From here on, keep a goal on purpose or let it go on purpose.
Chapter 6. Whose Dream Are You Living? of The Method Trap, by John “Jonyprofit” Whaley. One idea, one story, one assignment. About the book
The people in this story are composites drawn from nearly forty years across the table from owners, executives and professionals. Names, industries and numbers are changed.